On instability and popular election-based government

Much could be said about the Scott Brown victory in Massachusetts, and, of course, much is being said.  Will Democrats see  it as a wake up call to slow their health care reform rush  or as an indicator to accelerate to ramming speed?  Is a solid Republican win in Massachusetts — a Blue State of Blue States — simply a matter of local politics or a true indication of national public mood?

Well, let the political news mags and blogs hammer all of that out.  For now, I think I’ll pass along a note from the WSJ’s James Taranto that, I think, highlights just how unstable popular election-based governments can be:

One obvious lesson of yesterday’s result is that there is no such thing as a permanent majority in American politics. Democrats should have learned this lesson in 1994; if they did, they had forgotten it by 2008. Republicans surely learned it recently enough to remember.

Consider how quickly things turned bad for the Republicans, and how bad they turned. In 2004, the GOP picked up six Senate seats, knocking off Tom Daschle in South Dakota and winning five open seats, all in the South, where Democrats were retiring. (The net gain was four seats, since Democrats picked up open seats in Colorado and Illinois.) The GOP had a 55-seat majority in the 109th Congress.

Imagine if we had told you on Nov. 3, 2004, that the Republicans would not pick up another Senate seat until 2010. It would have been hard to believe, right? Now imagine if we had added that the seat that finally ended their slump would be the one held by Ted Kennedy. The only crazier thing we can think of is if we’d predicted on Thanksgiving 2009 that the New York Jets would make it to the conference championship.

I don’t have time to discuss here the many government-related issues this topic really does touch (and I mean that in the broadest terms, not just concerning civil government but church government, as well, and other similar structures).  But I thought (as I frequently do) that Mr. Taranto’s observations were worth sharing.

I’m just thankful that a time is coming when the burden of government will rest on one perfect set of shoulders (Isaiah 9:6) and the flip-flops of a fickle humanity will be a thing of the past.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

3 thoughts on “On instability and popular election-based government

  1. This particular political event tempts me to be as partisan as I’ve ever allowed myself to be. While it won’t stop the Obama Administration’s seeming headlong rush toward national suicide, it might slow the charge down enough for a measure of sanity to return and prevail – enough to let us continue to live a quiet and peaceable life and to do God’s Work.

  2. Flipflops of fickle humanity gone one day, along with it’s father (satan) WHEWWW And just think we’ll witness it and be used to bring it to pass. WOW YESSSSS !!!! Thanks be to our AWESOME GOD !!!

    Thanks Mr. Smith for Thoughts en Route
    Much Love
    Todd from New Orleans

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s