British regulators approve of Cowboys

In the UK, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has given the “green light” to the creation of hybrid cow-human embryos–part animal, part human–for the sake of stem cell research.  Almost sounds like a horrible joke, doesn’t it?  (Unlike my title, which is a horrible joke.)  But no joke: it’s a reality.

You can read the BBC article yourself, which discusses the decision: “‘Human-animal’ embryo green light” — actually, the article (as of my viewing this evening) contains a number of links to previous articles which can give the interested reader a view of the issue’s progression, including the shifting views of the British government.  One can be sure that money has played its role, as well–similar to the cries of those who believe the U.S. must accept all forms of stem cell research or risk its standing as a leader in the biosciences and, of course, the economic standing that goes with it (a January 2007 Larry Summers FT article comes to mind on this; here’s the link, but the article requires subscription).

Some will take comfort in the fact these hybrid part cow/part human embryos are to be destroyed within 14 days of their creation.  Some will take comfort in the fact that such research may, one day, lead to the cures of many diseases.  Some may take comfort in the fact that strict protocols will be developed for these procedures.  None of these considerations provides me any comfort, I must say.

On the other hand, some will be concerned with the ethical boundary that is being crossed here.  Some will be concerned with the sorts of things the public seems increasingly willing to allow in the name of “cures” and will be concerned with the role of easily-manipulated public opinion in establishing ethical guidelines for the practice of medicine and science.  Some will be concerned about what other morally and ethically challenged research will be OK’d in the future using the same reasoning.  Count me in that group.

Humanity is something to be treasured as unique.  Man and woman are the only beings on earth made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26).  Even those atheists who disregard that truth and believe that no “God” ever said such a thing must admit that this principle of the unique status of man on the earth has been an important and vital concept woven into the fabric of our culture — playing a major role in the crafting of civilization, itself.  Proverbs 22:28 warns both the religious and irreligious alike: “Do not remove the ancient landmark which your fathers have set.”  Has the removal of this landmark really been given proper consideration?

[An I-Can’t-Help-It Aside: There is a reason that we speak of treating animals “humanely.”  If we treated animals like animals treat animals then we would routinely tear them to pieces for our own benefit, whatever the benefit, without mercy or compunction.  It’s amazing how so many (though not necessarily all) who argue that we’re “just animals” tend to demand that we behave so differently from animals — that is: that we behave so humanely.  On the differences between man and beast and how humans are obligated to treat animalkind, Mr. Crockett has an excellent commentary here.

OK, back on topic…]

In terms of prophecy, I do see in this a reflection of Matthew 24:12, but I see elements of 2 Timothy 3:1-4 in all of this, too.  Arguable, to be sure, but that’s my take (“unholy” definitely seems to fit).  Increasingly, God is not seen as having any role at all in determining the boundaries on what is acceptable scientific endeavor, and any shred of self-restraint in consideration of what used to be common sense notions is categorized more and more as “quaint but unhelpful.”

Once, long ago, when God saw that mankind was able to achieve anything it desired — without restraint — He saw that this was a bad thing and did something about it (Gen. 11:6-7).  As we witness this new breed of “cowboy” making its appearance on the earth here in the 21st century, do any of you get a sense of what God might have been thinking?  I do.

Thankfully, He will intervene this time, too (Matthew 24:22), but things will get awfully ugly before then.

5 thoughts on “British regulators approve of Cowboys

  1. Deano

    Well, I must say that my stomach nearly flipped and hurled when I read even just the first paragraph. Images of Middle Earth’s Uruk-hai come to mind. Do you think someone may have this in mind–to make super warriors somehow?

    It is interesting that those who demand the humane treatment of animals will suck a baby right out of his or her mother’s womb without a blinking twice.

    Truly amazing and utterly disgusting ….

    What will they think of next?

  2. Wade

    Excellent commentary on the whole sordid affair. I know Solomon said there is nothing new under the sun, but if he were alive today to witness what you have been commenting on, he may want to reconsider his words! I’m sure – no, I’m positive – that down through the ages human beings have committed all kinds of terrible, horrific and unspeakable acts of evil on his fellow brothers, but its really hard for me to fathom that our society will only become more evil than it ever has before its all said and done. Thanks again for your very excellent commentary!

  3. Solomon seems to have implied that while technology changes, the basic issues of the human condition don’t. The same human nature that inspired what he documented is the same human nature that inspires today’s evils. In that sense, there really is nothing new under the sun. But factor in something else — as God put it at Babel (RSV), “this is only the beginning of what they will do, and nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them” — and it’s easy to see how the same cycles of human history and human nature come up with worse and worse evils per cycle.

    Yes, I thought of Middle-earth’s Uruk-hai too…and centaurs and minotaurs and ape-men…and every bad science-fiction novel since BRAVE NEW WORLD. The last two verses of Malachi take on a whole new meaning: truly this earth will become worthy of a ban of utter destruction, and only the work of “Elijah” will prevent it.

  4. Pingback: Embryonic stem cell research decision: Absolutely vomitous « Thoughts En Route

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s