Commentary Preview: God and the Foundation of Science

[Howdy, all!  I hope your Sabbath is going well so far.  Today has been rather busy, as we have been preparing for our big pre-Holy Days trip to Texas.  (FYI: I do plan on taking my laptop, but I do not know if I will be able to interact with this blog as often as I normally do, so my apologies if postings and moderation activity is a bit delayed!)

Before heading off to bed uncharacteristically early tonight, I thought I would post a draft commentary that I recently submitted to Charlotte.  I do not know if it will be needed or not and I am sure it needs some editing, but I hope that you find it thoughtful reading for the Sabbath.  May God bless your day of rest, and we will talk to you again soon!]
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

God and the foundation of science

Science has discovered so many amazing things about our universe!  A recent National Geographic article (March 2007), for instance, discusses the work of astrophysicist Adam Burrows which suggests that intense sound waves are the key ingredient behind supernovas, the massive explosions that destroy dying stars.

In fact, the computer models indicate that an exploding star would generate an audible tone to anyone foolishly close enough to hear it.  According to the magazine it would be “roughly the F note above middle C.”

Science has truly revealed a world of wonder in the universe that Almighty God has created!  Yet the success of science in so doing has motivated many scientists to say that there is no God.  In fact, the assumption that there is no God is hailed by some as the key assumption underlying all of science!  Working “God free,” they claim, has allowed them to discover truths that might otherwise go “uninvestigated” because they would be too quickly attributed to the hand of an invisible and incomprehensible deity.  According to them, the key to understanding the creation is first understanding that it is not truly a creation at all.

Yet, is the work of science really “free” of a Creator as these men and women assume?  Hardly.

There is a fundamental assumption at the heart of science, without which science would become impossible.  It is the assumption that the universe is orderly and can even be understood in the first place.

Albert Einstein spoke of this idea when he said, “The most incomprehensible thing about the Universe is that it is comprehensible.”  Why should the universe make any sense to us at all?  And yet it not only makes sense, but it does so beautifully and elegantly.  Everywhere we look we see laws at work – laws that we can not only discover, but also understand.

This fact is reflected in the words of the apostle Paul: “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).

It is no coincidence that many of the greatest scientists in history, such as Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, were devout believers in God – men whose faith compelled them to believe in a universe designed in an orderly fashion.  They were men who believed in the words of Proverbs 25:2, “It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, but the glory of kings is to search out a matter.”

Albert Einstein, quoted earlier, held to a concept of God that could certainly be described as vague and impersonal.  Yet believe in a God he did.  Columnist George F. Will, writing in The Washington Post on January 6, 2005, quotes an analogy Einstein offered as to why he believed in the existence of a Supreme Intelligence:

“We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many different languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn’t know what it is.”

As many modern day scientists stand up in their pride, point to their findings and discoveries and boldly declare that there is no God, they do so, ironically, standing on a foundation that would not exist had it not first been laid by the loving hand of a wise and orderly God.

If you are interested in finding out how you can KNOW that there is, indeed, a God who created the world around us and who wants you to know your place and purpose in that world, then please request our booklet, The Real God: Proofs and Promises.  It is absolutely free – request your copy today!

Booklet - The Real God: Proofs and Promises 

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
[P.S.  The “F note above middle C” thing that I mention above really did fascinate me.  When I read it, I went straight to our piano and struck that key repeatedly to imagine it.  Such is the life of the easily entertained!  — Have a wonderful Sabbath, WGS]

3 thoughts on “Commentary Preview: God and the Foundation of Science

  1. Deano

    Mind boggling and awe inspiring. Brings to mind a comment that, to me a great servant of God, the late Mr. David Burson made during a Bible study: “Our universe, in all its vastness, may only be a pin hole in the vastness of God’s eternal reality – His realm”, or something like that.

    To use Mr. Einstein’s analogy: Perhaps the library he spoke of is really likened to just one small elementary library amongst all the libraries on a planet similar to ours within a solar system similar to ours within a galaxy … etc …

    Our vast and incredible universe full of its wonders and obvious laws and design, God is more than big enough to have accomplished. How big is He really? Mind boggling and awe inspiring.

    Thanks for sharing this with us. It is a good way to start off a beautiful Sabbath morning.

    Deano

  2. Here is something that you may find fascinating. I do:

    The Scientific Existence of a Higher Intelligence
    by Robert A. Herrmann, Ph.D.
    Mathematics Department, U. S. Naval Academy,
    572 Holloway Rd.,
    Annapolis, Md 21402-5002

    Creation Research Society Quarterly 30(4):218 March, 1994
    http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/30/30_4a.html

    And here’s another:

    Socrates Meets Darwin: A Study in Question Begging
    Gary Colwell, Ph.D.

    Creation Research Society Quarterly 33(2):127 September, 1996
    http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/33/33_2a.html

    Blessings in Messiah,
    John Wheeler

  3. ALEX

    I was amazed to hear (on the radio last year) that the father of Newtonian Physics was also a theologan. I looked into it…. It turns out that he wrote more about religion than he did about science…. and he had some of the truth.

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s